A history of the event in 1054 which divided the christianity and led the eastern orthodox church an

Iconoclasm The Iconoclasm — and — was a movement within the Byzantine church to establish that the Christian culture of portraits see icon of the family of Christ and subsequent Christians and biblical scenes were not of a Christian origin and therefore heretical. This forbade many of the ornaments that Moses was commanded to create in the passages right after the commandment was given, i. The Orthodox Church understands this in a wider sense as a ban on no carved images: Tensions with the Papacy[ edit ] See also:

A history of the event in 1054 which divided the christianity and led the eastern orthodox church an

Building Bridges - Healing Division The split of between the Orthodox and Catholics There is a long history leading up to the split ofincluding the Filioque. The split of was not an isolated event, but kind of like the final split in a marriage that had become bad. In Catholic theology we call a family, the "Domestic Church.

For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.

What if he dominates too much? What happens if the wife is constantly seeking to usurp the God given authority of the husband?

This might be a model of the marriage between east and west in the Church. The proclamation of Jesus to Peter is not unlike the proclamation of St. As a Catholic, it is difficult to affirm that Christ has appointed the Bishop of Rome to the very specific tasks of shepherding the flock and feeding the sheep Jn It is kind of like when God appointed the husband in a marriage to a very specific role of leading the household.

But we choose to yield to his will, which ultimately will bring about much greater good than my modern ideas of equity and power sharing, which are partially responsible for the skyrocketing divorce rates. We pray for healing of the Church, just as we pray for the healing of the institution of modern marriages and families.

The declaration concerns the Catholic-Orthodox exchange of excommunications in Among the obstacles along the road of the development of these fraternal relations of confidence and esteem, there is the memory of the decisions, actions and painful incidents which in resulted in the sentence of excommunication leveled against the Patriarch Michael Cerularius and two other persons by the legate of the Roman See under the leadership of Cardinal Humbertus, legates who then became the object of a similar sentence pronounced by the patriarch and the Synod of Constantinople.

Thus it is important to recognize the excesses which accompanied them and later led to consequences which, insofar as we can judge, went much further than their authors had intended and foreseen.


They had directed their censures against the persons concerned and not the Churches. These censures were not intended to break ecclesiastical communion between the Sees of Rome and Constantinople.

The Byzantine patriarch attacked the Latin churches in Constantinople - Latin-speaking churches which existed since the time of Constantine; and he declared that their Eucharist was invalid because the Romans use unleven rather than leven bread -- something that the Western Church along with the Armenian Church had always done since the time of the Apostles Jesus Himself used unleven bread at the Last Supper, since it was a Passover feast and there would not have been any leven bread in Jerusalem at the time.

So, he took armed soldiers into the Latin churches in Constantinople, and had them open the Tabernacles and throw the consecreated Eucharist in the streets. This is a historical fact.

It is discussed by both Kallistos Ware and by Meyendorff in their books. This is why Rome a church which continued to permit and encourage Byzantine worship in its own city served Cerularius with a bull of excommunication in Why did they excommunicate Cerularius in the middle of a Church service? We got an email that said: He sent someone into the Church and slapped the paper down onto the altar.

That was over the top, an unecessary attempt to disgrace him for disgracing Christ in the Latin Eucharist. Orthodox bishop Kallistos formerly Timothy Ware writes, that the choice of cardinal Humbert was unfortunate, for both he and Patriarch Michael I were men of stiff and intransigent temper After [an initial, unfriendly encounter] the patriarch refused to have further dealings with the legates.

Eventually Humbert lost patience, and laid a bull of excommunication against Patriarch Michael I on the altar of the Church of the Holy. Perhaps one reason was to show that an excommunicated bishop should not serve Mass. Cerularius defiled Christ in the Eucharist which is the worst thing anyone can do.

Hugh adds "We should know because, we are currently chasing down a YouTube guy who is publicly defiling the Eucharist and it is extrememly serious with the police involved.

He was and died a public sinner.

A history of the event in 1054 which divided the christianity and led the eastern orthodox church an

Cerularius claimed that no Eucharist that uses unleven bread is a true Eucharist. If this is so, then no Eucharist ever offered in the Western Church, or in Armenia, or the Last Supper itself, which was a Passover feast, where only unleven bread was available was ever a true Eucharist.

Did Rome have the right to excommunicate Cerularius? Truth of this is- Rome had no right to [excommunicate Cerularius]. The question about whether Rome should have excommunicated Cerularius is a good one.What exactly divides Catholics and Orthodox?

Eastern Orthodoxy, official name Orthodox Catholic Church, one of the three major doctrinal and jurisdictional groups of regardbouddhiste.com is characterized by its continuity with the apostolic church, its liturgy, and its territorial churches. Its adherents live mainly in the Balkans, the Middle East, and former Soviet countries. In the year , the Christian Church split into a Western Church and an Eastern Church. In this schism, or official separation, the church in the west became the Roman Catholic Church and in the. Orthodox theologians argue that the mind (reason, rationality) is the focus of Western theology, whereas in Eastern theology, the mind must be put in the heart, so they are united into what is called nous, this unity as heart is the focus of Eastern Orthodox Christianity involving the unceasing Prayer of the heart.

Eastern and Western Christianity have been divided for a millennium, and although in recent decades both Catholic and Orthodox leaders have made. The office of universal ecclesiastical history is, as its name implies, to exhibit a well-balanced description of all phases of ecclesiastical life.

The investigation and treatment of the various phenomena in the life of the Church furnish the material of which universal church history is built.

It. Oct 23,  · An oversimplified overview of Church history from an Orthodox perspective. A Short History of Christianity Hank Hanegraaff Addressing John MacArthur's Comments about the Eastern Orthodox. The following is a capsule summary of the top 25 events in the History of Christianity, events which shaped the Church itself, Christian civilization, and the modern world.

The Eastern Orthodox Church, a branch of Christianity also known as Eastern Orthodoxy, Orthodox Christianity, or the Orthodox Church, is a body of Christians largely living in Eastern Europe. Schism of , also called East-West Schism, event that precipitated the final separation between the Eastern Christian churches (led by the patriarch of Constantinople, Michael Cerularius) and the Western church (led by Pope Leo IX).The mutual excommunications by the pope and the patriarch that year became a watershed in church history.

The excommunications were not lifted until , when.

East–West Schism - Wikipedia