Indian banking sector reforms

During the Meiji restoration period in the mid 19th century, the Japanese government actively pursued Western-style reforms and development — hiring more than 3, Westerners to teach modern science, mathematics and technology to Japan. The government at that time also led the way in industries, by equipping the public sector with strong infrastructural changes in order to spur the private sector to grow. In short, the government was to be the guide and business was the producer. MITI has been described by many scholars to have had the greatest impact on the economy of a nation than any other governmental regulation or organisation in the world.

Indian banking sector reforms

The spice trade between India and Europe was the main catalyst for the Age of Discovery.

Indian banking sector reforms

The inscription shown, is a Sanskrit invocation of Lord Shiva. The combination of protectionistimport-substitutionFabian socialismand social democratic -inspired policies governed India for sometime after the end of British rule. The economy was then characterised by extensive regulation, protectionismpublic ownership of large monopolies, pervasive corruption and slow growth.

Evidence of well-planned streets, a drainage system and water supply reveals their knowledge of urban planningwhich included the first-known urban sanitation systems and the existence of a form of municipal government.

Indian banking sector reforms

Both the Malabar and Coromandel Coasts were the sites of important trading centres from as early as the first century BC, used for import and export as well as transit points between the Mediterranean region and southeast Asia. Historians Tapan Raychaudhuri and Irfan Habib claim this state patronage for overseas trade came to an end by the thirteenth century AD, when it was largely taken over by the local Parsi, Jewish, Syrian Christian and Muslim communities, initially on the Malabar and subsequently on the Coromandel coast.

These traders built a Hindu templewhich suggests commerce was active and prosperous for Indians by the 17th century. Villages paid a portion of their agricultural produce as revenue to the rulers, while their craftsmen received a part of the crops at harvest time for their services.

Silver coin of the Gupta dynasty5th century AD. Mughal era — See also: Muslin trade in Bengal and Economy of the Kingdom of Indian banking sector reforms The Indian economy was large and prosperous under the Mughal Empireup until the 18th century.

The Mughal economy functioned on an elaborate system of coined currency, land revenue and trade. Gold, silver and copper coins were issued by the royal mints which functioned on the basis of free coinage.

Key industries included textilesshipbuildingand steeland processed exports included cotton textiles, yarnsthreadsilkjute products, metalwareand foods such as sugaroils and butter. This marked a determinative shift in India's trade, and a less-powerful impact on the rest of the economy.

As the painstaking statistical work of the Cambridge historian Angus Maddison has shown, India's share of world income collapsed from Indeed, at the beginning of the 20th century, "the brightest jewel in the British Crown" was the poorest country in the world in terms of per capita income.

From the beginning of the 19th century, the British East India Company 's gradual expansion and consolidation of power brought a major change in taxation and agricultural policies, which tended to promote commercialisation of agriculture with a focus on trade, resulting in decreased production of food crops, mass impoverishment and destitution of farmers, and in the short term, led to numerous famines.

The British East India Company, following their conquest of Bengal inhad forced open the large Indian market to British goods, which could be sold in India without tariffs or dutiescompared to local Indian producers who were heavily taxedwhile in Britain protectionist policies such as bans and high tariffs were implemented to restrict Indian textiles from being sold there, whereas raw cotton was imported from India without tariffs to British factories which manufactured textiles from Indian cotton and sold them back to the Indian market.

British economic policies gave them a monopoly over India's large market and cotton resources. It also established a system of railways and telegraphs, a civil service that aimed to be free from political interference, a common-law and an adversarial legal system.

However, at the end of colonial rule, India inherited an economy that was one of the poorest in the developing world, [] with industrial development stalled, agriculture unable to feed a rapidly growing population, a largely illiterate and unskilled labour force, and extremely inadequate infrastructure.

Subsequently, the policy of discriminating protection where certain important industries were given financial protection by the statecoupled with the Second World War, saw the development and dispersal of industries, encouraging rural—urban migration, and in particular the large port cities of BombayCalcutta and Madras grew rapidly.

Despite this, only one-sixth of India's population lived in cities by Leaders of the Indian independence movement and economic historians have blamed colonial rule for the dismal state of India's economy in its aftermath and argued that financial strength required for industrial development in Britain was derived from the wealth taken from India.

At the same time, right-wing historians have countered that India's low economic performance was due to various sectors being in a state of growth and decline due to changes brought in by colonialism and a world that was moving towards industrialisation and economic integration.

Economic historian Prasannan Parthasarathi presented earnings data which showed real wages and living standards in 18th century Bengal and Mysore being higher than in Britain, which in turn had the highest living standards in Europe. Licence Raj Indian economic policy after independence was influenced by the colonial experience, which was seen as exploitative by Indian leaders exposed to British social democracy and the planned economy of the Soviet Union.

Steel, mining, machine tools, telecommunications, insurance, and power plants, among other industries, were effectively nationalised in the mids. Figures are inflation-adjusted to International Geary-Khamis dollars.News and analysis of India's financial and commodity markets.

Trade, foreign investment related news and analysis. Assessment of global economic events. . The Japanese economy was one of the earliest in Asia to industrialise. During the Meiji restoration period in the mid 19th century, the Japanese government actively pursued Western-style reforms and development – hiring more than 3, Westerners to teach modern science, mathematics and technology to Japan.

The government at that time also led the way in industries, by equipping the public.

Author and Page information

These days most of the competition examinations have a paper for Financial Awareness or Banking Awareness. Moreover, candidates appearing in banking interviews and internal promotion exams always look for some easy to understand study material.

Features of banking Sector Reform in India Recalling some features of financial sector reforms in India would be in order, before narrating the processes. · First, financial sector reform was undertaken early in the reform-cycle in India.

The Indian banking system consists of 27 public sector banks, 22 private sector banks, 44 foreign banks, 56 regional rural banks, 1, urban cooperative banks and 93, rural cooperative banks, in addition to cooperative credit institutions.

37 CHAPTER – 4 REFORMS IN INDIAN BANKING SECTOR: AN OVERVIEW RELEVANCE AND NEED FOR REFORMS The Committee on the Financial System () had observed that the Indian Banking.

Banking Sector Reforms in India: A Survey